4.7 Review

Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccines in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 65, 期 8, 页码 1388-1395

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix524

关键词

influenza; vaccination; immunization; asthma; laboratory confirmed influenza

资金

  1. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government [AUKCAR/14/03]
  2. Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research [AUK-AC-2012-01]
  3. Asthma UK [CH11SJ, MRC-AsthmaUKCentre, MRC-Asthma UK Centre, AUK-AC-2012-01] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Chief Scientist Office [AUKCAR/14/03, AUKCAR/14/02] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [G1000758, G1000758B] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0515-10056, NF-SI-0514-10092] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is uncertainty about the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in persons with asthma and its impact on asthma outcomes, which may contribute to the suboptimal vaccination rates in persons with asthma. This systematic review and meta-analysis involved searching 12 international databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality quasi-experimental and epidemiological studies (1970-2016). The risk of bias was low for 3 included RCTs. The quality of 3 included observational studies was moderate. The quality of evidence was very low for all study outcomes. Pooled vaccine effectiveness in 1825 persons with asthma from 2 test-negative design case-control studies was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31%-56%) for laboratory-confirmed influenza. Pooled efficacy of live vaccines in reducing influenza was 81% (95% CI, 33%-94%). Live vaccine reduced febrile illness by 72% (95% CI, 20%-90%). Influenza vaccine prevented 59%-78% of asthma attacks leading to emergency visits and/or hospitalizations. For persons with asthma, influenza vaccination may be effective in both reducing influenza infection and asthma attacks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据