4.7 Article

Definition of optimal parameters for supercritical carbonation treatment of vegetable fiber-cement composites at a very early age

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 424-433

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.182

关键词

Cementitious matrixes; Curing process; Unbleached pulp; Bleached pulp; Mechanical behavior; Microstructure

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [33002010239P2]
  2. University of Toronto's Division of Engineering Science
  3. Faculty of Forestry
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo FAPESP [2013/23810-8, 2012/514673]
  5. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [150384/2016-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a study of cellulose pulp fiber-cement composites subjected to supercritical carbonation at a very early age. The raw materials used for the creation of cementitious composite mixes include: Portland cement, limestone filler, and cellulose pulp. Composites were produced by a slurry vacuum dewatering process and subjected to curing conditions which studied the effect of supercritical carbonation concentration (0% and close to 100% of CO2), the effect of cellulosic pulp (unbleached or bleached), and durability. All samples were subjected to mechanical, physical, and microstructural tests. The initial period of thermal curing (varying from 24 h to 48 h) and exposure time to carbonation (from 1 h to 2 h), did not have a statistically significant effect on the mechanical performance of the composites. However, the flexural test results of carbonated composites reinforced with bleached pulp showed a statistically significant improvement when compared to unbleached pulp reinforcement (24% increased average modulus of rupture). Thus, for cementitious composites cured with supercritical carbonation, the use of bleached cellulosic pulp, 24 h of thermal hydration and 1 h in an environmental chamber provided the optimal curing conditions and the most desirable properties in this study. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据