4.7 Article

Value and Application of Trimodality Therapy or Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

期刊

CANCER
卷 123, 期 20, 页码 3904-3915

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30823

关键词

concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT); squamous cell carcinoma; surgery alone; thoracic esophageal cancer; trimodality therapy

类别

资金

  1. Taipei Medical University [TMU105-AE1-B26]
  2. Wan Fang Hospital [106-eva-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Few large, prospective, randomized studies have investigated the value and optimal application of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (trimodality therapy) or definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC). METHODS The authors analyzed data from patients with TESCC in the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. To compare their outcomes, patients with TESCC were enrolled and categorized into the following groups according to treatment modality: group 1, those who underwent surgery alone; group 2, those who received trimodality therapy; and group 3, those who received definitive CCRT. Group 1 was used as the control arm for investigating the risk of mortality after treatment. RESULTS In total, 3522 patients who had TESCC without distant metastasis were enrolled. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that a Charlson comorbidity index score 3, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IIA, earlier year of diagnosis, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and definitive CCRT were significant, independent predictors of a poor prognosis. After adjustment for confounders, adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall mortality in patients with clinical stage I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC TESCC were 2.01 (95% CI, 0.44-6.18), 1.65 (95% CI, 0.99-2.70), 1.48 (95% CI, 0.91-2.42), 0.66 (95% CI, 1.08-1.14), 0.39 (95% CI, 0.26-0.57), and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.24-0.83), respectively, in group 2; and 2.06 (95% CI, 1.18-3.59), 2.65 (95% CI, 1.76-4.00), 2.25 (95% CI, 1.49-3.39), 1.34 (95% CI, 0.79-2.28), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-1.17), and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.51-1.71), respectively, in group 3. CONCLUSIONS Trimodality therapy may be beneficial for the survival of patients with advanced-stage (IIIA-IIIC) TESCC, and CCRT might be an alternative to surgery alone in these patients. (C) 2017 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据