4.5 Article

Effects of escitalopram and imipramine on cocaine reinforcement and drug-seeking behaviors in a rat model of depression

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1673, 期 -, 页码 30-41

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.07.016

关键词

Cocaine self-administration; Depression; Escitalopram; Imipramine; Olfactory bulbectomy; Rats

资金

  1. Operating Program of Innovative Economy (Poland) [POIG.01.01.02-12-004/09]
  2. statutory funds of the Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Depression and substance cocaine abuse are disorders with a high frequency of comorbidity. In the present study, we combined bilateral olfactory bulbectomy (OBX), an animal model of depression, with intravenous cocaine self-administration and extinction reinstatement in rats to investigate the effects of two antidepressant drugs, escitalopram (ESC) and imipramine (IMI), with the goal of determining whether these drugs altered cocaine-induced reinforcement and seeking behaviors. Acute administration of IMI (2.5-30 mg/kg) reduced the cocaine reinforcement in OBX and SHAM rats. Moreover, IMI effectively reduced the cocaine-seeking behavior after the drug acute or repeated administration during extinction training in OBX rats and SHAM-operated controls. By contrast, acutely administered ESC (2.5-20 mg/kg) did not alter cocaine reinforcement in OBX rats or SHAM-operated controls. The lack of ESC effects was also demonstrated during reinstatement tests to study drug-seeking behavior after ESC repeated daily treatment during extinction trials. However, acute treatment with ESC dose dependently decreased the cocaine-seeking behavior and relapse triggered by cocaine priming or drug associated conditioned cues in both OBX and SHAM rats. These results indicate the cocaine anti-reinforcement and anti-seeking efficacy of the two antidepressant drugs studied here. However, the mechanisms for the IMI and ESC activity should be clarified in further studies. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据