4.7 Article

Nitration of TRPM2 as a Molecular Switch Induces Autophagy During Brain Pericyte Injury

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 27, 期 16, 页码 1297-1316

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2016.6873

关键词

autophagy; TRPM2; nitrosative stress; protein nitration; pericyte; brain

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [81120108023, 81573411, 81473202, 31471118]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB910204, 2014CB910300]
  3. Zhejiang Province Program for Cultivation of High-level Health Talents and New Century 151 Talent Project of Zhejiang Province
  4. Department of Education, Henan Province
  5. University of Leeds-Zhejiang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Dysfunction of neurovascular pericytes underlies breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, but the molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. In this study, we evaluated the role of the transient receptor potential melastatin-related 2 (TRPM2) channel and autophagy during brain pericyte injury both in vitro and in vivo. Results: A rapid induction in autophagy in human brain vascular pericytes, in the zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NP)-induced cell stress model, was paralleled with an increase in the expression of the TRPM2-S truncated isoform, which was abolished by treatment with a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor and a peroxynitrite scavenger. Furthermore, Y1485 in the C-terminus of the TRPM2 protein was identified as the tyrosine nitration substrate by mass spectrometry. Overexpression of the Y1485S TRPM2 mutant reduced LC3-II accumulation and pericyte injury induced by ZnO-NP. Consistently, LC3-II accumulation was reduced and pericytes were better preserved in intact brain microvessels of the TRPM2 knockout mice after ZnO-NP-induced vascular injury. Innovation and Conclusions: Our present study has revealed a novel mechanism of autophagy disturbance secondary to nitrosative stress-induced tyrosine nitration of TRPM2 during pericyte injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 27, 1297-1316.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据