4.8 Article

Composite Gel Polymer Electrolyte for Improved Cyclability in Lithium-Oxygen Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 39, 页码 33819-33826

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b08448

关键词

Li-O-2 battery; electrolyte stability; composite gel polymer electrolyte; electrolyte decomposition; electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; lithium transference number; glass microfillers

资金

  1. FIU Dissertation Year Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gel polymer electrolytes (GPE) and composite GPE (cGPE) using one-dimensional glass micfofillers have been developed for their use in lithium-oxygen batteries. Using glass microfillers, tetraglyme solvent, UV-curable polymer, and lithium salt at various concentrations, the preparation of cGPE yielded free-standing films. These cGPEs, with 1 wt % of microfillers, demonstrated increased ionic conductivity and lithium transference number over GPEs at various concentrations of lithium salt. Improvements as high as 50% and 28% in lithium-transference number were observed for 0.l and 1.0 mol kg (-1) salt concentrations, respectively.-, Lithium-oxygen batteries containing cGPE similarly showed superior charge/discharge-(;) cycling for 500 mAli g (_1) cycle capacity with as high as 86% and 400% increase in cycles for cGPE with 1.0 and 0.1 mol kg (-1) over GPE. Results using-electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy revealed that the source of the improvement was the reduction of the rate of lithium carbonates formation on'the surface of the cathode. This reduction in formation rate afforded by cGPE-containing batteries was possible due to the reduction of the rate of electrolyte decomposition. The increase in solvated to paired Li (+) ratio at the cathode, afforded by increased lithium transference dumber, helped reduce the probability of superoxide radicals reacting with the tetraglyme solvent. This stabilization during cycling helped' prolong the cycling life of the batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据