4.7 Article

The effect of QRS duration on cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS complex: a subgroup analysis of the EchoCRT trial

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 36, 期 30, 页码 1983-1989

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv242

关键词

Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Narrow QRS; QRS duration

资金

  1. Amgen
  2. Astra-Zeneca
  3. Bayer
  4. Biotronik
  5. Biosense Webster
  6. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  7. Boston Scientific
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  9. Daiichi-Sankyo
  10. Cook Medical
  11. Medtronic
  12. Novartis
  13. Pfizer
  14. Roche
  15. Sanofi-Aventis
  16. Sorin
  17. St. Jude Medical
  18. Bayer Healthcare
  19. Sorin Group
  20. CardioInsight
  21. Respicardia Inc.
  22. GE Healthcare
  23. Lantheus
  24. Servier
  25. Edwards Lifesciences
  26. Cardiorentis
  27. ARMGO
  28. Celladon
  29. RESMED
  30. GE
  31. EBR systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims In EchoCRT, a randomized trial evaluating the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with a QRS duration of <130 ms and echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony, the primary outcome occurred more frequently in the CRT when compared with the control group. According to current heart failure guidelines, CRT is recommended in patients with a QRS duration of >= 120 ms. However, there is some ambiguity from clinical trial data regarding the benefit of patients with a QRS duration of 120-130 ms. Methods and results The main EchoCRT trial was prematurely terminated due to futility. For the current subgroup analysis we compared data for CRT-ON vs. -OFF in patients with QRS < 120 (n = 661) and QRS 120-130 ms (n = 139). On uni- and multivariable analyses, no significant interaction was observed between the two groups and randomized treatment for the primary or any of the secondary endpoints. On multivariable analysis, a higher risk for the primary endpoint was observed in patients with a QRS duration of 120-130 ms randomized to CRT-ON vs. CRT-OFF (hazard ratio 2.18, 95% CI 1.02-4.65; P = 0.044). However, no statistically significant interaction, compared with patients with QRS < 120 ms randomized to CRT-ON vs. CRT-OFF, was noted (P-interaction = 0.160). Conclusions In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of EchoCRT, no benefit of CRT was evident in patients with a QRS duration of 120-130 ms. These data further question the usefulness of CRT in this patient population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据