4.8 Article

Fluoropolymer Nanosheet as a Wrapping Mount for High-Quality Tissue Imaging

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 37, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201703139

关键词

agarose embedding; nanosheets; sample mounting; tissue imaging; wrapping

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT) [2306]
  2. MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI Grant [JP15H05953, JP26242082]
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency [MP27115663001]
  4. MEXT-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities
  5. Cooperative Research Program in Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices [20161027]
  6. Research Program of Dynamic Alliance for Open Innovation Bridging Human, Environment and Materials in Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices [20173007]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H05953] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the field of biological microscopy technology, it is still a practical challenge to obtain high-quality tissue images, due to the tissue desiccation that occurs during observations without an effective sample mounting. Inspired by the use of plastic food wrap, this study proposes the use of polymer thin films (also known as nanosheets) to fix the tissue samples. Water-repellent nanosheets composed of the amorphous fluoropolymer CYTOP are prepared with adjustable thicknesses and their hydrophobicity, transparency, and adhesion strength are evaluated. They show excellent water-retention effect and work well for sample fixation. By wrapping cleared mouse brain slices with a 133 nm thick CYTOP nanosheet, this study achieves high spatial resolution neuron images while scanning over a large area for a long period of time. No visible artifacts arising from sample shrinkage can be detected. This study also expects that nanosheet wrapping could be effective over a longer time span by combination with conventional agarose embedding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据