4.5 Article

Phosphorus Binding to Nanoparticles and Colloids in Forest Stream Waters

期刊

VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2016.07.0064

关键词

-

资金

  1. TERENO
  2. DAAD `Projektbezogener Personenaustausch mit Norwegen'
  3. DFG [1685]
  4. Ecosystem Nutrition: Forest Strategies for Limited Phosphorus Resources [KL 2495/1-1, SI 1106/8-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elemental contents in catchment headwaters are indicative of the load of nutrients and minerals cycled or released from ecosystems, yet little is known about natural colloids (1-1000 nm) and especially natural nanoparticles (NNP, 1-100 nm) as nutrient carriers in forested headwater streams. We hypothesize that the majority of P is bound to NNP in forest streams but that their size and composition varies for different forested headwater systems. Four forested sites in Germany and one in Norway, which differ in total P content, were sampled for stream water and analyzed for colloids. The samples were fractionated using field flow fractionation coupled to inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and an organic C detector. The results showed that NNP and colloids from all sites could be separated into three distinct fractions (approximately 1-20 nm, > 20-60 nm, and > 60 nm). The elemental concentrations of P, organic C, Al, Si, Fe, and Mn in the fractions differed among the five sites. However, cluster analysis showed that each fraction had unique elemental signatures with different preferential P binding partners. Phosphorus was preferentially associated with Fe in the smallest size fraction, with an increasing contribution of organic-C-associated P as the fraction size increased. The largest fraction was dominated by clay minerals. Also, the data indicated that the relative contribution of the NNP and colloidal fractions for ecosystem nutrient supply rises as total P concentrations decline. The study highlighted the still underestimated importance of NNP for matter transport in forest streams and thus P cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据