4.7 Article

Differential interactions between Notch and ID factors control neurogenesis by modulating Hes factor autoregulation

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 144, 期 19, 页码 3465-3474

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.152520

关键词

Notch signaling; Id transcription factors; Neural stem cells; Neurogenesis; Computational biology

资金

  1. SystemX.ch of the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation)
  2. NeuroStemX project
  3. Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung [310030_143767]
  4. Universitat Basel
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_143767] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During embryonic and adult neurogenesis, neural stem cells (NSCs) generate the correct number and types of neurons in a temporospatial fashion. Control of NSC activity and fate is crucial for brain formation and homeostasis. Neurogenesis in the embryonic and adult brain differ considerably, but Notch signaling and inhibitor of DNA-binding (ID) factors are pivotal in both. Notch and ID factors regulate NSC maintenance; however, it has been difficult to evaluate how these pathways potentially interact. Here, we combined mathematical modeling with analysis of single-cell transcriptomic data to elucidate unforeseen interactions between the Notch and ID factor pathways. During brain development, Notch signaling dominates and directly regulates Id4 expression, preventing other ID factors from inducing NSC quiescence. Conversely, during adult neurogenesis, Notch signaling and Id2/3 regulate neurogenesis in a complementary manner and ID factors can induce NSC maintenance and quiescence in the absence of Notch. Our analyses unveil key molecular interactions underlying NSC maintenance and mechanistic differences between embryonic and adult neurogenesis. Similar Notch and ID factor interactions may be crucial in other stem cell systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据