4.5 Article

Stripping Voltammetry for the Real Time Determination of Zinc Membrane Diffusion Coefficients in High pH: Towards Rapid Screening of Alkaline Battery Separators

期刊

ELECTROANALYSIS
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 2261-2267

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elan.201700337

关键词

Anodic Stripping Voltammetry; Zinc detection; Alkaline Battery Membrane; Zincate Diffusion; Celgard 3501; Cellophane 350P00

资金

  1. Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Sandia National Laboratories
  2. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003525]
  3. Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) sensing platform which provides real time determination of zincate diffusion through membrane separators in alkaline electrolyte with total experimental times on the order of hours is presented. Advanced separators are essential for future rechargeable alkaline zinc batteries. In order to be screened, these membranes need to be evaluated for their zincate blocking performance. Current complexometric titration and elemental analysis methods for zincate membrane diffusion characterization can take days to weeks to obtain results as well as include large sample dilution factors and require additional sample processing. The anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) sensing platform presented here provides real time determination of zincate diffusion in alkaline electrolyte with total experimental times on the order of hours. This method eliminates the need for sample dilution and post experiment sample processing. This technique significantly increases the throughput for the screening of advanced alkaline battery separators resulting in rapid turnaround times in the analysis of these vital membranes. To evaluate the utility of this method, zincate diffusion through commercial Celgard 3501 and Cellophane 350P00 was monitored using both ASV and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) methods. The obtained zincate diffusion coefficients for both techniques were found to compare favorably.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据