4.5 Article

Influenza A haemagglutinin specific IgG responses in children and adults after seasonal trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccination

期刊

VACCINE
卷 35, 期 42, 页码 5666-5673

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.044

关键词

Influenza; LAIV3; HA; Antibody; HA-stalk; Adults; Children

资金

  1. Influenza Centre at the University of Bergen
  2. Bergen Clinical Vaccine Consortium
  3. Ministry of Health and Care Services, Norway
  4. Norwegian Research Council [220670/H10]
  5. European Union [Univax 601738]
  6. Helse Vest
  7. K.G. Jebsen Centre
  8. NIAID

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influenza is a major respiratory pathogen and vaccination is the main method of prophylaxis. In 2012, the trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV3) was licensed in Europe for use in children. Vaccine induced antibodies directed against the main viral surface glycoprotein, haemagglutinin (HA), play an important role in virus neutralization through different mechanism. The objective of this study was to dissect the HA specific antibody responses induced after LAIV3 immunization to the influenza A viruses in children and adults. Plasma was collected from 20 children and 20,adults pre- and post-LAIV3 vaccination (up to a year) and analysed by the haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and ELISA assays. We found that LAIV3 boosted the HA specific IgG response against the head and the full-length of H3N2 in children, but not adults. Adults had higher levels of pre-existing stalk antibodies (towards H3N2 and H1N1), but these were not boosted by LAIV3. Importantly, we observed a trend in boosting of H1N1 HA stalk specific antibodies in children after LAIV3. Whereas, heterosubtypic H5 and H7 full-length HA specific antibodies were not boosted in either children or adults. In conclusion, LAIV3 elicited H3-head and low levels of H1 stalk specific antibody responses in children, supporting the prophylactic use of LAIV in children. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据