4.7 Article

Amphipathic dextran-doxorubicin prodrug micelles for solid tumor therapy

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 47-56

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.06.023

关键词

Prodrug; Doxorubicin; Dextran; Acid-labile; Drug resistance

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFA0201600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21371117, 31571024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A group of micelles self-assembled from deoxycholic acid-doxorubicin-conjugated dextran (denoted as Dex-DCA-DOX) prodrugs were designed and prepared for pH-triggered drug release and cancer chemotherapy. These prodrugs could be successfully produced by chemically coupling hydrophobic deoxycholic acid (DCA) to dextran hydrazine (denoted as Dex-NHNH2) and hydrazone linker formation between doxorubicin (DOX) and Dex-NHNH2. These Dex-DCA-DOX prodrugs self-assembled to form micelles under physiological conditions with varied particle sizes depending on molecular weight of dextran, degree of substitution (DS) of DCA and DOX. After optimization, Dex10k-DCA9-DOX5.5 conjugate comprising dextran of 10 kDa, DCA of DS 9 and DOX loading content of 5.5 wt%, formed the micelles with the smallest size (110 nm). These prodrug micelles could slowly liberate DOX under physiological conditions but efficiently released the drug at an acidified endosomal pH by the hydrolysis of acid-labile hydrazone linker. In vitro cytotoxicity experiment indicated that Dex10k-DCA9-DOX5.5 micelles exerted marked antitumor activity against MCF-7 and SKOV-3 cancer cells. Besides, intravenous administration of the micelles afforded growth inhibition of SKOV-3 tumor bearing in nude mice at a dosage of 2.5 mg per kg with anti-cancer efficacy comparable to free DOX-chemotherapy but low systemic toxicity. This study highlights the feasibility of bio-safe and efficient dextran-based prodrug micelles designed for cancer chemotherapy. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据