4.4 Article

Dietary Inflammatory Index and Risk of Bladder Cancer in a Large Italian Case-control Study

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 84-89

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.09.026

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian Foundation for Research on Cancer (FIRC)
  2. Italian Ministry of Health, General Directorate of European and International Relations [8942]
  3. United States National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R44DK103377]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between diet in relation to its inflammatory property and bladder cancer (BC) risk. METHODS In this study we explored the association between the dietary inflammatory index (DII) and BC risk in an Italian case-control study conducted between 2003 and 2014. Cases were 690 patients with incident and histologically confirmed BC from 4 areas in Italy. Controls were 665 cancerfree subjects admitted to the same network of hospitals as cases for a wide spectrum of acute, nonneoplastic conditions. The DII was computed based on dietary intake assessed using a reproducible and valid 8-item food frequency questionnaire. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated through logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, total energy intake, and other recognized confounding factors. RESULTS Subjects in the highest quartile of DII scores (ie, with a more pro-inflammatory diet) had a higher risk of BC compared to subjects in the lowest quartile (ie, with an anti-inflammatory diet) (ORQ(uartile4vs1) = 1.97; 95% [confidence interval], 1.28, 3.03; P trend =.003). Stratified analyses produced stronger associations between DII and BC risk among females (ORQuartile4vs1 = 5.73; 95% CI = 1.46, 22.44), older >= 65 years (ORQuartile4vs1 = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.38, 4.34), subjects with higher education >= 7 years (ORQuartile4vs1 = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.27, 3.88), and never smokers (ORQuartile4vs1 = 4.04; 95% CI = 1.51, 10.80). CONCLUSION A pro-inflammatory diet as indicated by higher DII scores is associated with increased BC risk. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据