4.7 Article

New operational mode of an electrochemical reactor and its application to the degradation of levofloxacin

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.08.041

关键词

Single-pass flow electrochemical reactor; Levofloxacin degradation; Gas diffusion electrode; Fenton reaction

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation [FAPESP] [2013/02762-5, 2014/50945-4, 2013/16690-6, 2014/11486-4, 2016/01937-4]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [CAPES]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [CNPq] [301492/2013-1, 446436/2014-3, 465571/2014-0]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [16/01937-4, 14/50945-4, 14/11486-4] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flow-by electrochemical reactor is generally used in batch mode with extended process time in order to achieve high efficiency in the removal of organic contaminant from aqueous solution. Moreover, the batch mode system is inappropriate for the treatment of wastewater in high volume or as a continuous stream. This paper presents a new operational mode for the electrochemical reactor in which the electrolyte passes over the electrodes just once at a reduced flow rate and with high hydraulic retention time. The concentration of hydrogen peroxide generated in the reactor running in the single-pass flow mode attained 10.2 mg L-1 cm(-2) in acid medium, a value similar to that obtained previously with the same type of reactor operating in batch mode. In the single-pass mode, the electrochemical reactor showed high rates of removal of the antibiotic levofloxacin (initial 50 mg L-1) and organic load (initial 130 mg L-1) up to 99 and 86%, respectively, when operated under electro-or photo-Fenton degradation conditions (acid medium with Fe2+ ions; absence or presence of UV irradiation). Degradation of levofloxacin generated high levels of nitrate (up to 4.5 mg L-1) and various by 'products that could be identified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据