4.6 Article

In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking?

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
卷 145, 期 2, 页码 259-276

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2854-3

关键词

Sustainability management; Legitimacy; Profit-seeking; Corporate sustainability; Sustainability management practices

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The academic debate why and how companies are dealing with sustainability is dominated by two main arguments-the profit-seeking and the legitimacy-seeking view. While the first argues that companies (only) establish sustainability management measures if this helps to increase their economic success, others emphasize that companies predominantly react on societal pressure dealing with sustainability (only) to secure legitimacy. Whereas both lines of argument have gained a lot of attention in academia, little is known about their relative importance in shaping corporate practice. This papers aims to fill this gap with an empirical analysis of corporate practices of large companies in ten countries worldwide. To capture the organizations' rationale in sustainability management practice, we systematically applied various measures related to actors and operational activities focusing on the companies' intention to pursue sustainability management, the integration of sustainability management to the core business, and the actual implementation of related measures. Overall the findings indicate that seeking legitimacy dominates corporate sustainability management practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据