4.7 Article

Numerical and analytical investigation of irrigant penetration into dentinal microtubules

期刊

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 1-17

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.07.013

关键词

Root canal therapy; Irrigation; Dentinal tubules; CFD; Concentration; Diffusion; Analytic solution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Irrigation is one of the most important steps in root canal therapy. Sodium hypochlorite is inserted into the root canal to eliminate bacteria and dissolve necrotic tissue. Dentinal tubules are micrometer sized channels along the dentin thickness. An irrigant should have the ability to penetrate into these tubules to remove bacteria residing in them. The difference between the concentrations of the inserted irrigant and the dentinal tubule fluid is the main factor of penetration. This study attempts to model dentinal tubules with precise dimensions and to study the time dependent irrigant penetration into them by using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The effects of needle type and position in the dentinal tubule were also considered. The results showed that concentration distribution would be different when the tubule was modeled as a frustum compared to the cylindrical shape tubule. Dentinal tubule curvature, however, did not have a noticeable effect in irrigant penetration. It was also concluded that when the needle working length is 3 mm, concentration can be considered constant at the tubule's entrance for tubules located at more than 1 mm from the apex. Moreover, by irrigating the root canal with a side-vented needle instead of an open-ended one, the concentration would be less for the tubules located in the apex region. Analytical solutions for different cases were also obtained, and their predictions were found to be in good agreement with the numerical results. Therefore, the presented analytical solutions can be directly used to obtain irrigant concentration in tubules with no need for additional computer simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据