4.7 Article

How climate change perception is reshaping attitudes towards the functional benefits of urban trees and green space: Lessons from Hong Kong

期刊

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 74-83

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.007

关键词

Climate change; Greening; Hong Kong; Public perception; Urban green space; Urban trees; Weather

资金

  1. Griffith Climate Change Response Program (Griffith University)
  2. Dr Stanley Ho Alumni Challenge Fund (University of Hong Kong)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban greening has rapidly emerged as a key urban climate change adaptation strategy. Urban greening is thought to confer manifold socio-ecological benefits upon residents in towns and cities. Yet proponents of urban greening have seldom considered how people's support for greening policies may be shaped by weather and climate. This paper reports the results of exploratory research examining public expectations of adverse weather changes and people's attitudes toward the functional benefits of urban trees and green space. Results of a questionnaire survey of 800 residents of Hong Kong indicate a positive relationship. Respondents tended to rate functional benefits as more important if they anticipated adverse weather changes in the near future, namely, rising temperatures, more tropical cyclones and prolonged rain. This subjective weather effect is more salient when these weather changes are perceived as a threat to one's daily life. We found urban greenery is assigned a higher value by individuals concerned about exposure and vulnerability to climatic stressors. Affinity for greening appears to be related to how weather and climatic variability is perceived. This observation is informed by a broader geographic perspective, which construes weather and climate as part of the spatial environment in which urban nature is apprehended and comprehended. An explanation for our findings is that increasingly volatile weather can potentially reshape urban residents' interactions with nature, based on perceived krelief and/or protection from climate-related threats. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据