4.7 Article

A Phase 1 study of ARQ 087, an oral pan-FGFR inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumours

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 117, 期 11, 页码 1592-1599

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.330

关键词

FGFR inhibitor; solid tumours; FGFR2 fusion; phase 1

类别

资金

  1. ArQule, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: ARQ 087 is an orally administered pan-FGFR inhibitor with multi-kinase activity. This Phase 1 study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ARQ 087 and defined the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumours received ARQ 087 administered initially at 25mg every other day and dose-escalated from 25 to 425mg daily (QD) continuous dosing. FGF19, 21, 23, and serum phosphate were assessed as potential biomarkers of target engagement. Results: 80 patients were enrolled, 61 in dose-escalation/food-effect cohorts and 19 with pre-defined tumour types in the expansion cohort. The most common ARQ 087-related adverse events were fatigue (49%), nausea (46%), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increase (30%), and diarrhoea (23%). Four patients (5%) experienced grade 1 treatment-related hyperphosphataemia. Dose-limiting toxicity was reversible grade 3 AST increase. The RP2D was 300mg QD. Pharmacokinetics were linear and dose-proportional from 25 to 325mg QD, and were unaffected by food. Statistically significant changes (P-valueo0.05) suggest phosphate and FGF19 levels as markers of target engagement. In 18 evaluable patients with FGFR genetic alterations, 3 confirmed partial responses (two intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCA) with FGFR2 fusions and one urothelial cancer with FGFR2 and FGF19 amplification) and two durable stable disease at >= 16 weeks with tumour reduction (FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCA and adrenocortical carcinoma with FGFR1 amplification) were observed. Conclusions: ARQ 087 had manageable toxicity at the RP2D of 300mg QD, showed pharmacodynamics effects, and achieved objective responses, notably in patients with FGFR2 genetic alterations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据