4.8 Article

Controllable Fabricating Dielectric-Dielectric SiC@C Core-Shell Nanowires for High-Performance Electromagnetic Wave Attenuation

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 46, 页码 40690-40696

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b13063

关键词

SiC; nanowires; dielectric property; core-shell structure; electromagnetic wave absorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572062]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [B2015002]
  3. Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Scientific Research Developmental Fund [LBH-Q16079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterostructured dielectric-dielectric nanowires of SiC core and carbon shell (SiC@C) with high-performance electromagnetic wave absorption were synthesized by combining an interfacial in situ polymer encapsulation and carbonization process. This approach overcomes the shortcomings of previous reported methods to prepare carbon shell that both carbon shell and free carbon particles are formed simultaneously. In our developed approach, the core of SiC nanowires are first positively charged. Then the negative resorcinol-formaldehyde polymers as the carbon source are anchored on SiC nanowires under the attraction of electrostatic force, which well suppresses the nucleation of free carbon particles. The thickness of the carbon shell could be modulated from 4 to 20 nm by simply adjusting the moral ratio of resorcinol to SiC nanowires. The resulting SiC@C core shell nanostructures without free carbon particles offer synergism among the SiC nanowires and the carbon shells, generating multiple dipolar polarization, surfaced polarization, and associated relaxations, which endow SiC@C hybrid nanowires with a minimum reflection loss (R-L) value of -50 dB at the frequency of 12 GHz and an effective absorption bandwidth of 8 GHz with R-L value under -10 dB at the optimized state. Our results demonstrate that SiC@C hybrid nanowires are promising candidates for electromagnetic wave absorption applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据