4.4 Review

A Scoping Review on Studies of Cyberbullying Prevalence Among Adolescents

期刊

TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 523-531

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1524838016641668

关键词

violence; cyberbullying; adolescents; scoping review

资金

  1. FEDER funding from the Operational Programme Factors of Competitiveness-COMPETE
  2. FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology (Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science) within the project Violence in various stages of life: Frequency, determinants and consequences of health'' [PTDC/SAU-SAP/122904/2010-FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-021439, SFRH/BPD/97015/2013]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-SAP/122904/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This descriptive scoping aims to understand how the prevalence of cyberbullying has been estimated across studies. A systematic scoping review of cyberbullying empirical studies was conducted by using three bibliographic databases to search for papers published between January 2004 and August 2014. A protocol was defined to identify the relevant papers. Papers selected were included in a data sheet developed by the authors to record specific findings. In total, 159 studies were included in the scoping review. Most of the prevalence studies were conducted in the last 4 years, mainly in North America (n = 77) and in Europe (n = 65). High methodological heterogeneity was found among the studies, which may contribute to explain variability in prevalence estimates. Cyberbullying experiences were assessed through several different perspectives: focused only on victims, focused only on perpetrators, or focused on both victims and perpetrators (without differentiating between if they are victims or perpetrators). Most of the studies tend to assess cybervictimization experiences. However, even considering the same perspective, the same country, and the same recall period, a high variability in the estimates was observed. As a main conclusion, the way in which the prevalence of cyberbullying is estimated is influenced by methodological research options.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据