4.3 Review

Efficacy and Safety of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Used in Patients With Diabetic Foot: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

期刊

CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
卷 39, 期 10, 页码 2088-2094

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.08.014

关键词

diabetic foot; hyperbaric oxygen therapy; randomized clinical trials; meta-analysis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81300657, 81370925]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The efficacy and safety profile of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with diabetic foot ulcer have been controversial in recent years. Our meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of HBOT in patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Clinical Trials.gov databases for controlled trials. The efficacy end points included the incidence of healed ulcers, major amputations, minor amputations, and reduction in the ulcer wound area. The tolerability end point was the incidence of adverse events. Findings: Nine randomized clinical trials involving 526 patients met the inclusion criteria. No difference was found in the incidence of healed ulcers (risk ratio [RR] = 2.22; 95% CI, 0.87-5.62; P = 0.32; I-2 = 81%), minor amputations (RR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.39-2.29; P = 0.91; I-2 = 74%), major amputations (RR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.17-1.28; P = 0.14; I-2 = 61%), and adverse events (RR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64-1.56; P = 0.99; I-2 = 26%) between the HBOT and standard therapy (ST) groups. HBOT was associated with a greater reduction in the ulcer wound area versus ST (standard mean difference = 1.12; 95% CI, 0.20-2.04; P = 0.04; I-2 = 70%). (C) 2017 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据