4.6 Article

Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 607-611

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/uog.15958

关键词

fetoscopic; laser surgery; PPROM; TTTS; twins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To assess the incidence, clinical course, risk factors and outcomes of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) after fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). Methods This was a prospective observational cohort study of 154 consecutive cases of TTTS. PPROM was defined as rupture of membranes before 34 weeks' gestation. Procedure-to-PPROM and PPROM-to-delivery intervals were determined. Relevant preoperative and intraoperative variables were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression to determine their impact on PPROM after FLS. Results The incidence of PPROM was 39% (n=60), occurring at a mean gestational age of 27.2+/-4.6 weeks. Median procedure-to-PPROM interval was 46 (range, 1-105; interquartile range (IQR), 13-66) days and median PPROM-to-delivery interval was 1 (range, 0-93; IQR, 0-13) day. Mean gestational age at delivery in cases with PPROM was 29.0+/-4.5 weeks compared with 32.6+/-3.9 weeks in cases without PPROM (P<0.0001). Insertion of a collagen plug was the only significant factor found on both univariate and multivariate analysis to be associated with an increased rate of PPROM (odds ratio, 3.1 (95% CI, 1.2-8.0); P=0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in fetal (P=0.07) or neonatal (P=0.08) survival between those with and those without PPROM. Conclusions PPROM after FLS increases prematurity by 3.6 weeks. The latency period after PPROM was 2 weeks; 50% of patients delivered within 24 h. No variable thought to be associated with PPROM after FLS was found to be significantly associated with this complication. Other etiologies and mechanisms for PPROM after FLS should be explored. Copyright (C) 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据