4.7 Article

Production of graphene quantum dots by ultrasound-assisted exfoliation in supercritical CO2/H2O medium

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 120-127

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.01.001

关键词

Graphene quantum dots; Supercritical CO2; Ultrasound-assisted exfoliation; Pristine graphene quantum dots

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51506124, 51676128]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, three kinds of graphene quantum dots (GQDs)-pristine graphene quantum dots (PGQDs), expanded graphene quantum dots (EGQDs) and graphene oxide quantum dots (GOQDs)-were produced from natural graphite, expanded graphite, and oxide graphite respectively in an ultrasound assisted supercritical CO2 (scCO(2))/H2O system. The effects of aqueous solution content ratio, system pressure, and ultrasonic power on the yields of different kinds of GQDs were investigated. According to these experiment results, the combination of the intense knocking force generated from high-pressure acoustic cavitation in a scCO(2)/H2O system and the superior penetration ability of scCO(2) was considered to be the key to the successful exfoliation of such tiny pieces from bulk graphite. An interesting result was found that, contrary to common experience, the yield of PGQDs from natural graphite was much higher than that of GOQDs from graphite oxide. Based on the experimental analysis, the larger interlayer resistance of natural graphite, which hindered the insertion of scCO(2) molecules, and the hydrophobic property of natural graphite surface, which made the planar more susceptible to the attack of ultrasonic collapsing bubbles, were deduced to be the two main reasons for this result. The differences in characteristics among the three kinds of GQDs were also studied and compared in this research. In our opinion, this low-cost and time-saving method may provide an alternative green route for the production of various kinds of GQDs, especially PGQDs. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据