4.4 Article

AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF COFFEE BEANS DYNAMICS IN A ROTARY DRUM

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 95, 期 12, 页码 2239-2248

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22961

关键词

rotary drum; coffee beans; flow regimes

资金

  1. Brazilian research funding agency CAPES (Federal Agency for the Support and Improvement of Higher Education, PNPD-National Postdoctoral Program)
  2. Brazilian research funding agency CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)
  3. Brazilian research funding agency FAPEMIG (State of Minas Gerais Research Support Foundation)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brazil is the largest producer and exporter of coffee in the world, one of the main global commodities. During the processing of coffee beans, rotary drums are used in the drying and roasting phases. This equipment is widely used in many industrial sectors. According to characteristics of the drum, particulate material, and operating conditions, different flow regimes may arise. Such regimes have a direct influence on the performance of these processes and therefore their characterization is of great importance. The present work developed an experimental study about the dynamics of coffee beans, under green and roasted conditions, in a rotary drum. Transitions between rolling, cascading, cataracting, and centrifuging regimes were evaluated, for both green and roasted coffee beans. For the centrifuging regime, a comparison between experimental critical rotation speeds and the ones obtained by correlations found in literature was performed. Additionally, a new expression to predict the centrifuging rotation speed was proposed by the authors. Further analyses regarding the rolling regime were also carried out. For this regime, velocity profiles of the particles were evaluated, as well as the thickness of the active layer for different filling degrees and drum rotation speeds. Great similarity was found between the behaviour of the active region for coffee beans before and after the roasting process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据