4.7 Article

Sonocatalytic degradation of diclofenac with FeCeOx particles in water

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 418-425

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.023

关键词

Diclofenac; FeCeOx; Ultrasound; Oxygen vacancy; Singlet oxygen

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities
  2. Research Funds of Renmin University of China [14XLNQ02, 15XNLD04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies the sonocatalytic degradation of diclofenac in water using FeCeOx-catalyzed ultrasound. The effects of pre-adsorption and gas addition were investigated. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption, SEM, XRD, Raman and XPS analyses of FeCeOx before and after sonication were characterized. The proposed mechanism was based on the microstructure changes of FeCeOx and reactive-species-scavenging performances. The results show that FeCeOx has excellent performance in catalyzing an ultrasonic system in water, and 80% of diclofenac was removed in 30 min ([Diclofenac] = 20 mg/L, FeCeOx amount = 0.5 g/L, pH = 6, ultrasonic density = 3.0 W/cm(3), ultrasonic frequency = 20 kHz, temperature = 298 K). The Fe, Ce, and 0 elements remained highly dispersed in the structure of FeCeOx, and the solid solution structure of FeCeOx remained stable after the reaction. Ce (III) was gradually oxidized to Ce (IV) and Fe (III) was gradually reduced to Fe (II) after the reaction, which indicates that Fe and Ce ions with different valences coexisted in dynamic equilibrium. The amount of oxygen vacancies in FeCeOx significantly decreased after the reaction, which indicates that oxygen vacancy participated in the ultrasonic process. Singlet oxygen O-1(2) was the primary reactive species in the degradation process, and the hydroxyl radicals (OH)-O-center dot and superoxide radical anion O-2(center dot-) also participated in the reaction. FeCeOx had excellent chemical stability with negligible leaching ions in the ultrasonic process. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据