4.7 Article

Effect of high-intensity ultrasound on the technofunctional properties and structure of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) seed protein isolate

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 436-444

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.01.042

关键词

Jackfruit protein isolate; High-intensity ultrasound; Technofunctional properties; Surface hydrophobicity; Scanning electron microscopy; Tricine-SDS-PAGE

资金

  1. National Council for Science and Technology of Mexico

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of high-intensity ultrasound (HIU) on the technofunctional properties and structure of jack fruit seed protein isolate (JSPI) was investigated. Protein solutions (10%, w/v) were sonicated for 15 min at 20 kHz to the following levels of power output: 200, 400, and 600 W (pulse duration: on-time, 5 s; off-time 1 s). Compared with untreated JSPI, HIU at 200 W and 400 W improved the oil holding capacity (OHC) and emulsifying capacity (EC), but the emulsifying activity (EA) and emulsion stability (ES) increased at 400 W and 600 W. The foaming capacity (FC) increased after all HIU treatments, as opposed to the water holding capacity (WHC), least gelation concentration (LGC), and foaming stability (FS), which all decreased except at pH 4 for FS. Tricine sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Tricine-SDS-PAGE) showed changes in the molecular weight of protein fractions after HIU treatment. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) demonstrated that HIU disrupted the microstructure of JSPI, exhibiting larger aggregates. Surface hydrophobicity and protein solubility of the JSPI dispersions were enhanced after ultrasonication, which increased the destruction of internal hydrophobic interactions of protein molecules and accelerated the molecular motion of proteins to cause protein aggregation. These changes in the technofunctional and structural properties of JSPI could meet the complex needs of manufactured food products. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据