4.7 Article

Ultrasound-assisted degradation of organic dyes over magnetic CoFe2O4@ZnS core-shell nanocomposite

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 298-309

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.01.019

关键词

CoFe2O4@ZnS; Core-shell nanocomposite; Magnetic sonocatalytic; Ultrasound-assisted degradation; Organic dyes

资金

  1. Lorestan University
  2. Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council (INIC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic CoFe2O4@ZnS core-shell nanocomposite was successfully synthesized via one-step hydrothermal decomposition of zinc(II) diethanoldithiocarbamate complex over CoFe2O4 nanoparticles at low temperature of 200 degrees C. The obtained nanocomposite was characterized by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, UV-Vis spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, magnetic measurements, and Brunauere-Emmette-Teller. The results confirmed the formation of CoFe2O4@ZnS nanocomposite with the average crystallite size of 18 nm. The band gap of 3.4 eV was obtained using UV-vis absorption of CoFe2O4@ZnS nanocomposite, which made it a suitable candidate for sono-/photo catalytic processes. This nanocomposite was applied as a novel sonocatalyst for the degradation of organic pollutants under ultrasound irradiation. The results showed complete degradation of methylene blue (MB) (25 mg/L) within 70 min in the presence of CoFe2O4@ZnS nanocomposite and H2O2 (4 mM). The trapping experiments indicated that OH radicals are the main active species in dye degradation. In addition, sonocatalytic activity of the CoFe2O4@ZnS nanocomposite was higher than those of pure ZnS and CoFe2O4, showing that the combining ZnS with magnetic CoFe2O4 could be an excellent choice to improve its sonocatalytic activity. The nanocomposite could be magnetically separated and reused without any observable change in its structure and performance even after five consecutive runs. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据