4.7 Article

Synthesis of poly(acrylamide-co-itaconic acid)/MWCNTs superabsorbent hydrogel nanocomposite by ultrasound-assisted technique: Swelling behavior and Pb (II) adsorption capacity

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 1-12

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.12.028

关键词

Nanocomposite; Hydrogel; Carbon nanotubes; Swelling behavior; Adsorption; Pb (II); Ultrasonic waves

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, the poly (acrylamide-co-itaconic acid)/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (P(AAm-co-IA)/ MWCNTs) as a novel superabsorbent hydrogel nanocomposite was synthesized by graft copolymerization of acrylamide (AAm) and itaconic acid (IA) mixture in the presence of the MWCNTs using ammonium persulfate (APS) as a free radical initiator and methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) as a crosslinker under ultrasound-assisted condition. The blank P(AAm-co-IA) hydrogel and its composite with the MWCNTs were characterized by means of SEM, FTIR, XRD and TGA methods. The effects of different parameters such as pH, time, the MWCNTs content and salt solutions on swelling behavior were investigated. The stability of the hydrogel increased by any increase in the MWCNTs content, which might be attributed to the hydrophobic nature of the MWCNTs as well as the increase of the crosslinker density. The water retention capacity (WRC) of the P(AAm-co-IA) hydrogel increased in the presence of the MWCNT (10 wt%). The synthesized hydrogel nanocomposite was studied for Pb (II) adsorption from aqueous solution. The effects of different parameters such as contact time (5-90 min), Pb (II) initial concentration (25-175 mg/L) and initial pH (1.5-4.5) of solution on Pb (II) adsorption were investigated by batch method. In comparison to P(AAm-co-IA) hydrogel, the P(AAm-co-IA)/MWCNTs hydrogel nanocompoite showed better adsorption behavior toward Pb (II). One of the most important aspects of this research was to investigate the effects of ultrasonic waves on polymer matrix and its ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据