4.4 Article

TEM sample preparation by femtosecond laser machining and ion milling for high-rate TEM straining experiments

期刊

ULTRAMICROSCOPY
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.12.001

关键词

Femtosecond laser machining; In situ transmission electron microscopy; Dynamic TEM; Sample preparation; High strain rate

资金

  1. Army Research Laboratory [W911NF-12-20022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To model mechanical properties of metals at high strain rates, it is important to visualize and understand their deformation at the nanoscale. Unlike post mortem Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), which allows one to analyze defects within samples before or after deformation, in situ TEM is a powerful tool that enables imaging and recording of deformation and the associated defect motion during mechanical loading. Unfortunately, all current in situ TEM mechanical testing techniques are limited to quasi-static strain rates. In this context, we are developing a new test technique that utilizes a rapid straining stage and the Dynamic TEM (DTEM) at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The new straining stage can load samples in tension at strain rates as high as 4x103/s using two piezoelectric actuators operating in bending while the DTEM at LLNL can image in movie mode with a time resolution as short as 70 ns. Given the piezoelectric actuators are limited in force, speed, and displacement, we have developed a method for fabricating TEM samples with small cross-sectional areas to increase the applied stresses and short gage lengths to raise the applied strain rates and to limit the areas of deformation. In this paper, we present our effort to fabricate such samples from bulk materials. The new sample preparation procedure combines femtosecond laser machining and ion milling to obtain 300 mu m wide samples with control of both the size and location of the electron transparent area, as well as the gage cross-section and length.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据