4.8 Article

Tree-Inspired Design for High-Efficiency Water Extraction

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 44, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201704107

关键词

high efficiency; light trapping; solar energy harvesting; solar steam generation; tree-inspired design

资金

  1. Maryland Nanocenter, its Surface Analysis Center
  2. AIMLab
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Department of Education (JPDE)
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  5. Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solar steam process, akin to the natural water cycle, is considered to be an attractive approach to address water scarcity issues globally. However, water extraction from groundwater, for example, has not been demonstrated using these existing technologies. Additionally, there are major unaddressed challenges in extracting potable water from seawater including salt accumulation and long-term evaporation stability, which warrant further investigation. Herein, a high-performance solar steam device composed entirely of natural wood is reported. The pristine, natural wood is cut along the transverse direction and the top surface is carbonized to create a unique bilayer structure. This tree-inspired design offers distinct advantages for water extraction, including rapid water transport and evaporation in the mesoporous wood, high light absorption (approximate to 99%) within the surface carbonized open wood channels, a low thermal conductivity to avoid thermal loss, and cost effectiveness. The device also exhibits long-term stability in seawater without salt accumulation as well as high performance for underground water extraction. The tree-inspired design offers an inexpensive and scalable solar energy harvesting and steam generation technology that can provide clean water globally, especially for rural or remote areas where water is not only scarce but also limited by water extraction materials and methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据