4.7 Article

VEGF-mediated tight junctions pathological fenestration enhances doxorubicin-loaded glycolipid-like nanoparticles traversing BBB for glioblastoma-targeting therapy

期刊

DRUG DELIVERY
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 1843-1855

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1386731

关键词

VEGF; glioblastoma; pathological; tight junctions; fenestration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81473144, 81273442]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existence of blood-brain barrier (BBB) greatly hindered the penetration and accumulation of chemotherapeutics into glioblastoma (GBM), accompany with poor therapeutic effects. The growth of GBM supervene the impairment of tight junctions (TJs); however, the pathogenesis of BBB breakdown in GBM is essentially poorly understood. This study found that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secreted by GBM cells plays an important role in increasing the permeability of BBB by disrupting endothelial tight junction proteins claudin-5 and thus gave doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded glycolipid-like nanoparticles (Ap-CSSA/DOX), an effective entrance to brain tumor region for GBM-targeting therapy. In addition, VEGF downregulates the expression of claudin-5 with a dose-dependent mode, and interfering with the VEGF/VEGFR pathway using its inhibitor axitinib could reduce the permeability of BBB and enhance the integrity of the barrier. Ap-CSSA/DOX nanoparticles showed high affinity to expressed low-density lipoprotein receptor-related proteins 1 (LRP1) in both BBB and GBM. And BBB pathological fenestration in GBM further exposed more LRP1 binding sites for Ap-CSSA/DOX nanoparticles targeting to brain tumor, resulting in a higher transmembrane transport ratio in vitro and a stronger brain tumor biodistribution in vivo, and finally realizing a considerable antitumor effect. Overall, taking advantage of BBB pathological features to design an appropriate nanodrug delivery system (NDDS) might provide new insights into other central nervous system (CNS) diseases treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据