4.5 Article

Capacity of semi-rigid composite joints in accommodating column loss

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 288-301

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.029

关键词

Composite joints; Progressive collapse; Bending moment combined with tension; Semi-rigid

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0701203]
  2. Shaanxi Provincial Education Department [17JK1154]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the scenario of column loss, joints would be subjected to bending moment combined with a tensile force due to large vertical displacement, where tensile force plays a critical role in resisting progressive collapse of structure by providing the catenary force. In order to study the effect of tensile force on the behavior of semi-rigid composite joints in structures in the case of column loss, six semi-rigid flush endplate connections tests were conducted, which include pure flexural tests, pure tensile tests and combined flexural and tensile tests. The experimental results indicate that under pure bending moment condition, the semi-rigid composite joint displays sufficient rotation capacity for forming catenary action. It is characteristic of the semi-rigid composite joint that its moment capacity decreases in a linear manner together with the increase of tensile load. Also, the capacity of semi-rigid composite joints is compared with that of the full-welded rigid composite joints. The tensile strength of high-strength bolts would not exert any effect on the initial stiffness of semi-rigid joint, but bring about decline in the moment resistance and tensile resistance of semi-rigid joint. The joints tend to fail at catenary phase under tensile force. A simplified M-N correlation formula for composite joint is proposed to describe the behavior of joint in structures under column loss. The finite element model with material failure criterion can predict the fracture of bolt in semi-rigid composite joint. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据