4.1 Article

FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF THREE PHASE INDUCTION MOTOR USING CURRENT SIGNAL, MSAF-RATIO15 AND SELECTED CLASSIFIERS

期刊

ARCHIVES OF METALLURGY AND MATERIALS
卷 62, 期 4, 页码 2413-2419

出版社

POLSKA AKAD NAUK, POLISH ACAD SCIENCES, INST METALL & MATER SCI PAS
DOI: 10.1515/amm-2017-0355

关键词

Fault; current; electrical signal; induction motor; diagnostics; classification

资金

  1. AGH University of Science and Technology [11.11.120.612, 11.11.120.815, 11.11.120.354]
  2. Grant Agency VEGA from Ministry of Education of Slovak Republic [1/0602/17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A degradation of metallurgical equipment is normal process depended on time. Some factors such as: operation process, friction, high temperature can accelerate the degradation process of metallurgical equipment. In this paper the authors analyzed three phase induction motors. These motors are common used in the metallurgy industry, for example in conveyor belt. The diagnostics of such motors is essential. An early detection of faults prevents financial loss and downtimes. The authors proposed a technique of fault diagnosis based on recognition of currents. The authors analyzed 4 states of three phase induction motor: healthy three phase induction motor, three phase induction motor with 1 faulty rotor bar, three phase induction motor with 2 faulty rotor bars, three phase induction motor with faulty ring of squirrel-cage. An analysis was carried out for original method of feature extraction called MSAF-RATIO15 (Method of Selection of Amplitudes of Frequencies - Ratio 15% of maximum of amplitude). A classification of feature vectors was performed by Bayes classifier, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Nearest Neighbour classifier. The proposed technique of fault diagnosis can be used for protection of three phase induction motors and other rotating electrical machines. In the near future the authors will analyze other motors and faults. There is also idea to use thermal, acoustic, electrical, vibration signal together.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据