4.7 Article

Structural transformation and multiferroic properties of Sm and Ti co-doped BiFeO3 ceramics with Fe vacancies

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 43, 期 17, 页码 14666-14671

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.187

关键词

BiFeO3; Sm substitution; Structural evolution; Multiferroics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61404071, U1204109, 51372069]
  2. Program for Innovation Talents in University of Henan Province [16HASTIT044, 14HASTIT038]
  3. Science and Technology Project of Henan Province [142102210109, 172102210013]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Luoyang Normal College [2014-PYJJ-006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sm and Ti co-doped BiFeO3 (BFO) ceramics with Fe vacancies-Bi0.86Sm0.14FeO3, Bi0.86Sm0.14Fe0.09Ti0.01O3, and Bi0.86Sm0.14Fe0.9Ti0.05O3-were prepared by a solid-state method using a rapid liquid process. X-ray diffraction indicated that all samples exhibited a rhombohedral structure with a minor secondary phase. The structural transformation from a rhombohedral (space group: R3c) to orthorhombic structure (space group: Pnma) was observed in the sample of Bi0.86Sm0.14Fe0.9Ti0.05O3, which was also confirmed by Raman scattering spectra. Microstructural investigations with scanning electron microscopy showed a reduction in grain size with doping of BFO. The dielectric loss of Bi0.86Sm0.14Fe0.9Ti0.05O3 reaches 0.05 (at 100 Hz) owing to the introduction of Ti and Fe vacancies. Ferroelectromagnetic measurements revealed the existence of ferroelectricity with a remanent polarization of 0.24 mu C/cm(2) in Bi0.86Sm0.14FeO3, paraelectricity in Bi0.86Sm0.14 Fe0.9Ti0.05O3, and weak ferromagnetism with a remanent magnetization of 0.2 emu/g in Bi0.86Sm0.14 Fe0.99Ti0.01O3. The two composition-driven phases exist simultaneously and the different coercive field might be related to the jumps in the ferromagnetic hysteresis loops. Both the ferroelectric and magnetic properties were shown to correlate with the composition-driven structural evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据