4.1 Review

Animal models as a tool in hepatocellular carcinoma research: A Review

期刊

TUMOR BIOLOGY
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1010428317695923

关键词

Chemical carcinogens; liver; syngeneic; xenograft; orthotopic; genetically engineered mouse; rodents

类别

资金

  1. PhD Grant of the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science [SFRH/BD/60280/2009]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/60280/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is the first cause of death in developed countries and the second in developing countries. Concerning the most frequent worldwide-diagnosed cancer, primary liver cancer represents approximately 4% of all new cancer cases diagnosed globally. However, among primary liver cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma is by far the most common histological subtype. Notwithstanding the health promotion and disease prevention campaigns, more than half a million new hepatocellular carcinoma cases are reported yearly, being estimated to growth continuously until 2020. Taking this scenario under consideration and the fact that some aspects concerning hepatocellular carcinoma evolution and metastasize process are still unknown, animal models assume a crucial role to understand this disease. The animal models have also provided the opportunity to screen new therapeutic strategies. The present review was supported on research and review papers aiming the complexity and often neglected chemically induced animal models in hepatocarcinogenesis research. Despite the ongoing debate, chemically induced animal models, namely, mice and rat, can provide unique valuable information on the biotransformation mechanisms against xenobiotics and apprehend the deleterious effects on DNA and cell proteins leading to carcinogenic development. In addition, taking under consideration that no model achieves all hepatocellular carcinoma research purposes, criteria to define the ideal animal model, depending on the researchers' approach, are also discussed in this review.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据