4.7 Article

Urinary and circulating levels of the anti-angiogenic isoform of vascular endothelial growth factor-A in patients with chronic kidney disease

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 475, 期 -, 页码 102-108

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.10.014

关键词

Chronic kidney disease; Glomerular filtration rate; Vascular endothelial growth factor-A(165)b

资金

  1. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  2. Nagoya University Hospital Funding for Clinical Research
  3. Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology
  4. Tsukuba Medical Laboratory Education and Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The protective effects of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A(165)b on kidney tissue have been suggested in animal studies. However, the relevance of urinary and circulating VEGF-A(165)b levels in chronic kidney disease patients remains unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the urinary and circulating VEGF-A(165)b levels in patients with chronic kidney disease. Methods: This observational study enrolled a total of 92 Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease, who had undergone inulin renal clearance measurements for the accurate assessment of measured GFR. Urinary or circulating total VEGF-A and VEGF-A(165)b levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Urinary VEGF-A(165)b levels were significantly lower in G3a, G3b, and G4 + G5 category patients than in G1 + G2 category patients. Correlation analysis found that serum creatinine levels, serum cystatin C levels, eGFRcre, eGFRcys, and mGFR were weakly but significantly correlated with urinary VEGF-A(165)b levels. Additionally, circulating VEGF-A(165)b levels were significantly higher in G4 + G5 category patients than in G1 + G2 category patients. Conclusion: A low urinary VEGF-A(165)b level reflects renal dysfunction in the chronic kidney disease stage, while a high circulating VEGF-A(165)b level cannot be attributed to decreased renal clearance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据