4.5 Article

Identification of universal gut microbial biomarkers of common human intestinal diseases by meta-analysis

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 93, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fix153

关键词

microbiota; gut diseases; microbiome; microbial biomarkers; metagenomics

资金

  1. EU Joint Programming Initiative-A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life (JPI HDHL)
  2. DvS [15/JP/HDHL/3280]
  3. MIUR
  4. Laboratory of Probiogenomics
  5. Fondazione Cariparma, Parma, Italy
  6. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), through the Irish Government's National Development Plan [SFI/12/RC/2273]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intestinal diseases, such as Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and pseudomembranous colitis (CDI), are among the most common diseases in humans and may lead to more serious pathologies, e.g. colorectal cancer (CRC). Next generation sequencing has in recent years allowed the identification of correlations between intestinal bacteria and diseases, although the formulation of universal gut microbial biomarkers for such diseases is only in its infancy. In the current study, we selected and reanalyzed a total of 3048 public datasets obtained from 16S rRNA profiling of individuals affected by CD, UC, CDI and CRC. This meta-analysis revealed possible biases in the reconstruction of the gut microbiota composition due to the use of different primer pairs employed for PCR of 16S rRNA gene fragments. Notably, this approach also identified common features of individuals affected by gut diseases (DS), including lower biodiversity compared to control subjects. Moreover, potential universal intestinal disease microbial biomarkers were identified through cross-disease comparisons. In detail, CTRL showed high abundance of the genera Barnesiella, Ruminococcaceae UCG-005, Alistipes, Christensenellaceae R-7 group and unclassified member of Lachnospiraceae family, while DS exhibited high abundance of Lactobacillus, unclassified member of Erysipelotrichaceae family and Streptococcus genera.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据