4.3 Article

Development and evaluation of a nested-PCR assay for Senecavirus A diagnosis

期刊

TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 337-344

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1436-z

关键词

Diagnostic; Molecular detection; Picornavirus infection; Seneca Valley virus; Vesicular disease

资金

  1. National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES)
  3. Financing of Studies and Projects (FINEP)
  4. Araucaria Foundation (FAP/PR)
  5. CNPq fellowships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Senecavirus A (SVA) has been associated with vesicular disease in weaned and adult pigs and with high mortality of newborn piglets. This study aimed to establish a nested-PCR assay for the routine diagnosis of SVA infection. Tissue samples (n = 177) were collected from 37 piglets of 18 pig farms located in four different Brazilian states. For the nested-PCR, a primer set was defined to amplify an internal VP1 fragment of 316 bp of SVA genome. Of the 37 piglets, 15 (40.5%) and 23 (62.2%) were positive for the SVA in the RTPCR and nested-PCR assays, respectively. The SVA RNA was detected in 61/177 (34.5%) samples with the RT-PCR, while the nested-PCR assay showed 84/177 (47.5%) samples with the virus (p < 0.05). According to the herds, 11 (61.1%) and 16 (88.9%) of the 18 pig herds were positive for the SVA in the RT-PCR and nested-PCR assays, respectively. Nucleotide sequencing analysis revealed similarities of 98.7-100% among SVA Brazilian strains and of 86.6-98% with SVA strains from other countries. The nested-PCR assay in this study was suitable to recover the SVA RNA in biological specimens, piglets, and/or herds that were considered as negative in the RT-PCR assay, and is proposed for the routine investigation of the SVA infection in piglets, especially when other techniques are not available or when a great number of samples has to be examined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据