4.3 Article

Metabolomics of the Wolfram Syndrome 1 Gene (Wfs1) Deficient Mice

期刊

OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 721-732

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/omi.2017.0143

关键词

metabolomics; Wolfram syndrome; wolframin; diabetes; endoplasmic reticulum stress

资金

  1. Institutional Research Funding [IUT20-42, PUT1416]
  2. Center of Excellence for Genomics and Translational Medicine from the Estonian Ministry of Education and Science
  3. European Union through the European Regional Development Fund [2014-2020.4.01.15-0012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wolfram syndrome 1 is a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease characterized by diabetes insipidus, diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, and deafness. Mutations in the WFS1 gene encoding the wolframin glycoprotein can lead to endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein responses in cells, but the pathophysiology at whole organism level is poorly understood. In this study, several organs (heart, liver, kidneys, and pancreas) and bodily fluids (trunk blood and urine) of 2- and 6-month old Wfs1 knockout (KO), heterozygote (HZ), and wild-type (WT) mice were analyzed by untargeted and targeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The key findings were significant perturbations in the metabolism of pancreas and heart before the onset of related clinical signs such as glycosuria that precedes hyperglycemia and thus implies a kidney dysfunction before the onset of classical diabetic nephropathy. The glucose use and gluconeogenesis in KO mice are intensified in early stages, but later the energetic needs are mainly covered by lipolysis. Furthermore, in young mice liver and trunk blood hypouricemia, which in time turns to hyperuricemia, was detected. In summary, we show that the metabolism in Wfs1-deficient mice markedly differs from the metabolism of WT mice in many aspects and discuss the future biological and clinical relevance of these observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据