4.7 Article

A new concept of the mechanism of tribocatalytic reactions induced by mechanical forces

期刊

TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 144-151

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2016.08.022

关键词

Triboreactions; Energy distribution; Boundary lubrication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this paper is to present a new approach to the mechanism of tribocatalytic reactions induced by mechanical forces. The new concept is based on the authors' previous research, which reveals that there exists a relationship between the modified coefficient of reagent reactivity alpha(i), the ratio of mechanical forces acting on a tribological system and a change in the internal energy of a lubricant (including a thin boundary layer). alpha(i)=(L-L-0)/ A exp[-E-a(RT+epsilon)] [(e(0)) cos (k(2)L+k(3))] t and 1/ A exp[-E-a(RT-epsilon)] [(e(0)) cos (k(2)L+k(3))] t = C The paper has been divided into two parts. Part One provides a theoretical analysis of the distribution of energy between a solid surface and the molecules of a lubricant during a tribological process. This part concludes with the formulation of three hypotheses: first, that the tribocatalyst transforms mechanical energy into a flux of electrons and/or photons, which provide additional amounts of energy to the molecules of the reagents, secondly, that the function C describes a wave of energy understood as a wave-like change in the internal energy of a tribological system caused by an increase in the applied load and, thirdly, that a chemical reaction can be initiated when i) the molecules of the reagent are supplied with energy equal to the activation energy Ea and ii) the energy is supplied by a sufficiently high flux. Part Two discusses the empirical data that initially confirm the above hypotheses. The evidence combines i) the experimental results concerning the emission of electrons during friction with ii) the test results obtained for a number of lubricating oils using the Timken apparatus and method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据