4.1 Review

The role of regulatory B cells in allergen immunotherapy

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000400

关键词

allergen immunotherapy; allergy; regulatory B; IL-10; tolerance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is currently the only curative treatment available for allergic diseases, and has been used in clinical practice for over a century. Induction and maintenance of immune tolerance to nonhazardous environmental and self-antigens is essential to maintain homeostasis and prevent chronic inflammation. Regulatory B (B-REG) cells are immunoregulatory cells that protect against chronic inflammatory responses primarily through production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10, transforming growth factor-, and IL-35. The importance of B-REG cells has been extensively demonstrated in the context of autoimmune diseases. Data showing their role in the regulation of allergic responses are slowly accumulating. This review summarizes recent findings relevant to the topic of B-REG cells and their potential role in AIT. Recent findings B-REG cells support AIT in models of allergic airway inflammation and intestinal inflammation through induction of regulatory T (T-REG) cells. In humans B-REG frequency increases during venom immunotherapy while the phenotype of allergen-specific B cells changes. Mechanisms of B-REG-mediated tolerance to allergens include IL-10-mediated suppression of effector T cell, including T(H)2 responses, induction of T-REG cells, IL-10-mediated inhibition of Dendritic cell maturation, modulation of T follicular helper responses, and production of anti-inflammatory IgG4 antibodies. Summary Current evidence supports a potential role for B-REG cells in induction and maintenance of allergen tolerance during AIT. A better understanding of the role of B cells and B-REG cells in AIT could open potential new windows for developing targeted therapies specifically focused on promoting B-REG responses during AIT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据