4.6 Article

Role of co-planting and chitosan in phytoextraction of As and heavy metals by Pteris vittata and castor bean - A field case

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 35-40

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.09.001

关键词

Co-planting; Metal chelator; Phytoextraction; Pteris vittata; Castor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41771509, 41771510, 41201312, 41271478]
  2. 863 Program [2013AA06A211-2]
  3. Science and Technology Service Network Initiative [KFJ-EW-STS-014]
  4. Special Project for Institute of Chinese Academic Sciences [TSYJS01]
  5. Phytoremediation Project of Farmland Polluted by Heavy Metal in Jiyuan County [JGZJ-2015152-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytoextraction is a promising technology that uses hyperaccumulating plants to remove arsenic (As) and heavy metals (HMs) from soil. A field experiment has been conducted to evaluate impacts of water-soluble chitosan (WC) upon the growth and phytoextraction of As, Cd and Pb by the hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L. and the economic plant castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) in a co-planting system in polymetallic contamination of agricultural soil. The co-planting system was comprised of As-hyperaccumulator and Pb high-accumulating P. vittata and Cd high-accumulating R. communis. The results showed that yields of P. vittata were significantly increased by co-planting. The results revealed that the uptake of As and Pb by P. vittata was also significantly increased by co-planting. When the WC was applied to the co-planting system, the uptake of Cd and Pb by P. vittata and R. communis was significantly increased, but the uptake of As was not increased obviously. This study suggested that the combination of co-planting system with WC is a more promising approach than single hyperaccumulator. This approach not only enhanced the removal rates of soil As and HMs, but also simultaneously offered agricultural practices with no edible products in the As and HMs contaminated farmland soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据