4.7 Article

Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in chronic insomnia patients and the association with poor treatment outcome at 2 months

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 475, 期 -, 页码 147-151

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.10.024

关键词

Chronic insomnia; Vitamin D; Outcome

资金

  1. Wenzhou Municipal Sci-Tech Bureau Program [Y20160002]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2015BA113B01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The association between low 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D) and sleep disorder has been reported. We investigated whether serum concentrations of 25(OH)D are altered in chronic insomnia patients. The relationship between serum concentrations of 25(OH)D and the treatment outcome in patients at 2 months was also investigated. Methods: In total, 181 chronic insomnia patients were consecutively recruited. All patients received pharmacotherapy for the treatment of chronic insomnia. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were quantified by a competitive electrochemiluminescence protein binding assay. Treatment outcomes were defined as response versus non-response, according to the change of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). We also recruited 100 healthy subjects as a control group. Results: Fifty-four out of 181 (29.8%) patients met the criteria for non-response. Chronic insomnia patients had significantly lower 25(OH)D concentrations compared with healthy controls (23.01 +/- 9.18 vs 27.17 +/- 6.41 ng/ml, P < 0.001). Non-response patients also had significantly lower 25(OH)D concentrations than those with response. Vitamin D deficiency(25(OH)D concentrations < 20 ng/ml) was independently associated with a higher probability of treatment non-response at 2 months (odds ratio 11.636, 95% confidence interval 3.966-34.142, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Measurement of serum 25(OH)D concentrations are probably useful for judging treatment outcomes of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据