4.7 Article

An Economic Analysis of the Threats Posed by the Establishment of Aedes albopictus in Brisbane, Queensland

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 203-213

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.015

关键词

Mosquito; Aedes albopictus; Benefit-cost analysis; Benefit transfer; Willingness to pay; Vector control

资金

  1. Mosquito and Arbovirus Research Committee, Queensland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aedes albopictus is an invasive mosquito, aggressive biter and potential disease vector. Its establishment in Europe and the Americas resulted in local disease transmission and impacted quality of outdoor recreational activities. Economic implications of its likely invasion into Australia had not been considered. A benefit-cost analysis of an elimination response scenario to an Ae. albopictus incursion in Brisbane was developed with a benefits transfer estimate of the local population's willingness-to-pay for an Ae. albopictus-free environment. Other costed considerations included i) necessary precautionary vector control responses to importations of mosquito-borne diseases (e.g. dengue, Zika) and ii) projected rises in complaints to local government regarding increased mosquito nuisance. Costs of implementing a successful elimination program were estimated between 1 and 4 AU$ per capita, and the annual benefit-cost ratio regarding the value of an unaffected outdoor environment was between 50 and 78. In the event of establishment, annual costs of local government and public health responses were between 0.5 and 1.3 AU$ per capita. The recurrent expense of permanent colonization will be magnified by loss of value associated with an Ae. albopictus-free environment. We conclude it is more cost-beneficial to conduct a thorough elimination program for Ae. albopictus than to allow establishment. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据