4.4 Article

Body mass index and clinical response to intravenous or subcutaneous abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 12, 页码 2655-2665

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3788-1

关键词

Body mass index; DAS28; Disease activity; Pharmacokinetics; Rheumatoid arthritis

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This post hoc analysis of ACQUIRE (NCT00559585) explored the effect of baseline body mass index (BMI) on the pharmacokinetics of and clinical response to subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ACQUIRE was a phase 3b, 6-month, double-blind, double-dummy study in which patients with RA were randomized (1: 1) to SC (fixed - dose; 125 mg/week) or IV (weight-tiered; similar to 10 mg/kg/month) abatacept plus methotrexate. In this analysis, minimum abatacept plasma concentration (C-min) was measured at 3 and 6 months, and clinical remission over 6 months was assessed by Disease Activity Score 28 (C-reactive protein; DAS28 [CRP], < 2.6), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI, <= 3.3), and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI, <= 2.8). Data were stratified by baseline BMI (underweight/normal, < 25 kg/m(2); overweight, 25 to < 30 kg/m(2); obese, >= 30 kg/m(2)) and administration route. Of the 1456/1457 patients for whom baseline BMIs were available, 526 (36%; SC 265, IV 261) patients were underweight/normal, 497 (34%; SC 249, IV 248) were overweight, and 433 (30%; SC 221, IV 212) were obese. Median C-min abatacept concentration was >= 10 mu g/mL (efficacy threshold) at 3 and 6 months in > 90% of patients across BMI groups with both administration routes. DAS28 (CRP), SDAI, and CDAI remission rates at 6 months were similar across BMI groups and 95% confidence intervals overlapped at all time points in both separate and pooled SC/IV analyses. Therapeutic concentrations of abatacept and clinical remission rates using stringent criteria were similar across patient BMIs and administration routes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据