4.4 Article

Electroencephalographic Resting-State Networks: Source Localization of Microstates

期刊

BRAIN CONNECTIVITY
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 671-682

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/brain.2016.0476

关键词

EEG resting-state source localization; EEG source imaging; resting-state networks

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [320030_159705]
  2. National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) SYNAPSY-The Synaptic Bases of Mental Diseases - Swiss National Science Foundation [51AU40_125759]
  3. NIH [P41EB015902]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [320030_159705] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using electroencephalography (EEG) to elucidate the spontaneous activation of brain resting-state networks (RSNs) is nontrivial as the signal of interest is of low amplitude and it is difficult to distinguish the underlying neural sources. Using the principles of electric field topographical analysis, it is possible to estimate the meta-stable states of the brain (i.e., the resting-state topographies, so-called microstates). We estimated seven resting-state topographies explaining the EEG data set with k-means clustering (N=164, 256 electrodes). Using a method specifically designed to localize the sources of broadband EEG scalp topographies by matching sensor and source space temporal patterns, we demonstrated that we can estimate the EEG RSNs reliably by measuring the reproducibility of our findings. After subtracting their mean from the seven EEG RSNs, we identified seven state-specific networks. The mean map includes regions known to be densely anatomically and functionally connected (superior frontal, superior parietal, insula, and anterior cingulate cortices). While the mean map can be interpreted as a router, crosslinking multiple functional networks, the seven state-specific RSNs partly resemble and extend previous functional magnetic resonance imaging-based networks estimated as the hemodynamic correlates of four canonical EEG microstates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据