3.8 Article

Calcium-dependent ultrasound stimulation of secretory events from pancreatic beta cells

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40349-017-0108-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [1R03EB019065-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Our previous studies have indicated that ultrasound can stimulate the release of insulin from pancreatic beta cells, providing a potential novel treatment for type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this study was to explore the temporal dynamics and Ca2+-dependency of ultrasound-stimulated secretory events from dopamineloaded pancreatic beta cells in an in vitro setup. Methods: Carbon fiber amperometry was used to detect secretion from INS-1832/13 beta cells in real time. The levels of released insulin were also measured in response to ultrasound treatment using insulin-specific ELISA kit. Beta cells were exposed to continuous wave 800 kHz ultrasound at intensities of 0.1 W/cm(2), 0.5W/cm(2) and 1 W/cm(2) for several seconds. Cell viability tests were done with trypan blue dye exclusion test and MTT analysis. Results: Carbon fiber amperometry experiments showed that application of 800 kHz ultrasound at intensities of 0.5 and 1 W/cm(2) was capable of stimulating secretory events for durations lasting as long as the duration of the stimulus. Furthermore, the amplitude of the detected peaks was reduced by 64% (p < 0.01) when extracellular Ca2+ was chelated with 10 mM EGTA in cells exposed to ultrasound intensity of 0.5 W/cm(2). Measurements of released insulin in response to ultrasound stimulation showed complete inhibition of insulin secretion by chelating extracellular Ca2+ with 10 mM EGTA (p < 0.01). Viability studies showed that 800 kHz, 0.5 W/cm(2) ultrasound did not cause any significant effects on viability and metabolic activity in cells exposed to ultrasound as compared to sham-treated cells. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that application of ultrasound was capable of stimulating the release of insulin from pancreatic beta cells in a safe, controlled and Ca2+-dependent manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据