4.7 Review

An overview of gelatin derived from aquatic animals: Properties and modification

期刊

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 102-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.012

关键词

Aquatic processing; Fishery by-products; Gelatin; Fish skins; Fish bones; Scales

资金

  1. Anhui Provincial Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [NYCYTX-2016-84]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Gelatin is a multifunctional ingredient used in the food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and photographic industries as a gelling agent, stabilizer, thickener, emulsifier, microencapsulating agent, and film-former. The most abundant sources of gelatin are pig skins, bovine hides, and cattle bones. However, the mammalian gelatins are rejected by some consumers due to either socio-cultural-religious or health related concerns. An alternative to mammalian gelatins are the aquatic gelatins, which are extracted from the by-products of aquatic food processing, such as the skins, bones, scales and fins of fish. Scope and approach: This review focuses on the main qualities of gelatin obtained from different aquatic animals. In addition, the strategies used to improve the properties of aquatic gelatins are discussed. Key findings and conclusions: Gelatin has been extracted from various fish species, and the physical and chemical properties of fish gelatin have been further investigated. Aquatic gelatins have very similar properties to mammalian gelatins, making them a potential substitute for pork and beef gelatins in many applications. The main limitation, however, for the use of aquatic gelatins is their weaker rheological properties when compared to mammalian gelatins. However, it is possible to improve the properties of aquatic gelatins using physical, enzymatic and natural cross-linking agents. Hopefully, gelatins derived from aquatic animals will be more widely used in various applications after modification using suitable methods. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据