4.8 Article

Deep Phenotypic Mapping of Bacterial Cytoskeletal Mutants Reveals Physiological Robustness to Cell Size

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 27, 期 22, 页码 3419-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.065

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stanford Bioengineering Agilent Fellowship
  2. Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowships
  3. Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  4. Gerald J. Lieberman Fellowship
  5. Bio-X Senior Fellowship
  6. NSF CAREER Award [MCB-1149328]
  7. NIH [DP2OD006466]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Size is a universally defining characteristic of all living cells and tissues and is intrinsically linked with cell genotype, growth, and physiology. Many mutations have been identified to alter cell size, but pleiotropic effects have largely hampered our ability to probe how cell size specifically affects fundamental cellular properties, such as DNA content and intracellular localization. To systematically interrogate the impact of cell morphology on bacterial physiology, we used fluorescence-activated cell sorting to enrich a library of hundreds of Escherichia coli mutants in the essential cytoskeletal protein MreB for subtle changes in cell shape, cumulatively spanning similar to 5-fold variation in average cell volume. Critically, pleiotropic effects in the mutated library are most likely minimized because only one gene was mutated and because growth rate was unaffected, thereby allowing us to query the general effects of morphology on cellular physiology over a large range of cell sizes with high resolution. We discovered linear scaling of the abundance of DNA and the key division protein FtsZ with cell volume, a strong dependency of sensitivity to specific antibiotics on cell width, and a simple correlation between MreB localization pattern and cell width. Our systematic, quantitative approach reveals complex and dynamic links between bacterial morphology and physiology and should be generally applicable for probing size-related genotype-phenotype relationships.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据